Coupling and Cohesion in an Organization
At work we have a team that is trying to make our deployments better.
They are taking cues from the 12 Factor App model. Generally, I believe this model provides a great start for designing your applications in terms of deployment. The one caveat is that you may be missing out some cohesion in your organization by assuming it is coupling.
The 12 Factor App was written by the fine folks at Heroku. Heroku is an application hosting platform that supports a variety of runtimes.
This is important because it means that Heroku’s use case is more generalized than most organizations. In order to support different runtimes consistently, there must be a lowest common denominator that works for all runtimes. Having this kind of generic requirement is not a negative, but it suggests that you are avoiding coupling that may not be necessary in an organization.
A good example of this is logging. The 12 Factor App defines that all logging should be a stream of events that are logged to stdout.
Obviously, if you are supporting multiple runtimes, demanding a specific logging platform is suboptimal. The language may not support the logging platform or some libraries might be dependent on other platform specific details. For example, supporting syslog could be done via the C library or simply calling the local syslog command in a process. Requiring an application log to a specific tool is an example of negative coupling for Heroku, but that doesn’t have to be the case in an organization.
A company that has control over its own deployment platform can very easily support a more specific logging system such as syslog. Using tools like puppet or chef, each host can meet any requirements necessary for the specific runtimes. Similarly, you are not tasked with inventing a system of log management as tools like syslog already have that functionality built in. More generally, you can separate management of logs from application development because you have a powerful tool you can depend on to be present. In one sense you are coupling yourself to a logging system, but in another sense, you really are finding a cohesive tool that makes things simpler across an organization.
Often times as developers we try to make solutions that are generic in order to meet needs now and in the future. Preparing for the future is a good idea, but it is always important to recognize when a generic solution is adding unnecessary complexity that doesn’t help the organization meet its needs. Coupling and cohesion are abstract concepts that change based on context. When you can set up a simple, seemingly highly coupled system, and it works with no problems for the next 5 years, then I’d argue that coupling was helpful in creating a cohesive solution.